Independent technical review
A second opinion that gets to the underlying question.
Independent review of a geochemical model, report, dataset or interpretation. Understand which conclusions are supported, which assumptions matter and what needs further work before a decision is made.
The decision
Can we rely on this model or interpretation?
A model has become difficult to explain, two interpretations disagree, or a technical decision needs an independent scientific perspective.
What the work can include
- Review the conceptual model, input data and stated purpose.
- Examine chemical assumptions, parameter choices and the interpretation of outputs.
- Identify missing evidence, sensitive assumptions and limits on the conclusions.
- Discuss the findings with technical teams and decision-makers.
Potential outputs
The exact deliverables are agreed in the scope. A package can include:
- A concise review memorandum with findings and limitations.
- An assumptions and evidence register.
- Prioritised recommendations for further analysis or measurement.
- A technical discussion to work through the implications.
Clear scope. Useful output.
A defined question, agreed deliverables and a transparent account of assumptions make the work easier to use.